For police force, online cctv surveillance tools certainly are a powerful pressure: They can catch forensic evidence; allow for real-time monitoring of occurrences; and help discover suspects. But the public should be fully enlightened about federal use of these systems. And when they are used, many tools need to be strictly limited in their range and length.

Visible camcorders are a criminal offense deterrent: In areas where they are located, criminal offenses are often reduced. When police will be able to identify the faces of suspects, it may produce it a lot easier for them to get a conviction.

But for some people, they make them feel more dangerous and protected. They’re also worried about the possibility that the government is spying on them.

The NSA’s PRISM application monitors Internet data, including emails, text messages, speech and online video chats, social media activity and more. PRISM is a perfect example of just how tools developed for the purpose of legitimate usages can be abused and serve ends for which they were not really intended.

Technology companies that sell mass surveillance products should step up to ensure they will aren’t permitting dictatorships and also other countries to track dissidents and persecute minorities. EFF is struggling with lawsuits against Cisco Systems and also other companies meant for supplying equipment to China, where they have been used to track or perhaps arrest person rights active supporters and workers.

The FBI and Team of Homeland Security have been using these tools to target Black Lives Subject protestors and others speaking out on issues like ethnic justice as well as the treatment of immigrants, justifying it by citing the specious category of “black identity extremism. ” These kinds of applications must arrive under greater oversight, and government agencies apply these tools must be held accountable when they break civil protections.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *